MT-9 Headstock steering bearings question

Are ya having a problem with your rig? We'll try to help. Share your tech tips and experiences here. Dr. Billy Glaser, author of the "Unofficial 750 Ural Service Manual" site myural.com, is moderating this section.
Forum rules
Here is the place for you to ask questions about or share your experiences about servicing or repairing your Ural or Dnepr. Please post topics concering modifications or accesories in the "Modifications and Acessories" section. Please post oil related questions in the "Oil Threads" section.
Post Reply
User avatar
Korto
Comrade
Comrade
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 7:31 am

MT-9 Headstock steering bearings question

Post by Korto » Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:32 am

This may seem a stupid question, but how tight should the steering bearings on the steering rod and bearing nut (aka "Jesus Nut", for some obscure reason) be?

I pulled my headstock apart when I noticed how shaky the front was under braking and tightening the bearing nut wasn't helping (I could tighten it all the way to locking the steering, and it still shook), and I noticed a couple of things.

1) I had put the tapered roller bearings in what was probably upside-down. :roll:

2) The inside race of the bearing could be easily slid on and off the steering rod (including where it thickens out down the bottom) by hand, and the meeting between the inner race and bearing nut can only be called sloppy, with visible wobble between the two.

Now, I can buy the bearing nut connection being loose, but I would really think at least the bearing onto the steering rod should be a press fit.
1972 Dnepr MT-9... mostly... I think...

User avatar
propwash
Order of Lenin
Order of Lenin
Posts: 1631
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:45 pm

Re: MT-9 Headstock steering bearings question

Post by propwash » Sat Jul 13, 2019 8:35 am

What tapered set did you use?

User avatar
Korto
Comrade
Comrade
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 7:31 am

Re: MT-9 Headstock steering bearings question

Post by Korto » Sat Jul 13, 2019 9:03 am

Good question. I bought them from sidecar pro a couple of years ago, so I can't remember any details, but looking at his site, and the numbers on the bearings, it's these:
http://sidecarpro.com/BFA-tapered-steer ... aring.html
He told me it would also suit my bike.

So the internal diametre of the bearing is 34mm (possibly true, I find it difficult to get an accurate ID with calipers, OD's easy), but I'm measuring the OD of the steering rod at 33.84mm.
1972 Dnepr MT-9... mostly... I think...

User avatar
propwash
Order of Lenin
Order of Lenin
Posts: 1631
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:45 pm

Re: MT-9 Headstock steering bearings question

Post by propwash » Sat Jul 13, 2019 9:40 am

Here is a link to the tapered bearings I use.
I prefer tapered in solos and ball with sidecar attached.
https://www.cycleworks.net/index.php?ma ... 4b2cfecb00

User avatar
Korto
Comrade
Comrade
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 7:31 am

Re: MT-9 Headstock steering bearings question

Post by Korto » Sat Jul 13, 2019 6:11 pm

What benefit do you feel the ball bearings give over tapered rollers with the sidecar? Because the only difference mentioned online is that ball bearings have less resistance and are therefore better at high rpm, while rollers have a bigger footprint and so are better dealing with more weight. Since turning the handlebars would involve no rpm worth speaking of, I can't see any benefit to balls, but obviously you do find one in practise.

Unfortunately, however, this still doesn't actually answer my original question. Does anyone know whether the bearing is supposed to be a press-fit on the steering rod, or a slip-fit?
1972 Dnepr MT-9... mostly... I think...

User avatar
propwash
Order of Lenin
Order of Lenin
Posts: 1631
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:45 pm

Re: MT-9 Headstock steering bearings question

Post by propwash » Sat Jul 13, 2019 6:46 pm

Slip fit, but should require a bit of tapping with wood to get it in place.
I find the tapers require more use of the damper than the balls with my sidecars.

User avatar
Korto
Comrade
Comrade
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 7:31 am

Re: MT-9 Headstock steering bearings question

Post by Korto » Sat Jul 13, 2019 7:22 pm

Which is tighter than what I've got. Maybe if I wrap a strip of aluminium foil around it, to bulk it out a little...
1972 Dnepr MT-9... mostly... I think...

jeffsaline
Hero of the Soviet Union - 2019
Hero of the Soviet Union - 2019
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 12:04 am
Location: Rapid City, South Dakota

Re: MT-9 Headstock steering bearings question

Post by jeffsaline » Sun Jul 14, 2019 12:51 am

Aluminum foil is just waiting to fail. Mearsure the thickness of the aluminum foil and then tap on it with a hammer. Then measure it again. It doesn't take much pressure to make the aluminum move/change dimensions.

Before using aluminum foil to fill the gap between the stem and the bearing inner race maybe consider using a center punch to raise dimples all around the stem where the inner race makes contact. Depending on the wear you might have to do 50 or more dimples. It should be an interference fit meaning the hole in the inner race should be smaller than the outer diameter of the stem. My guess is maybe 0.001"-0.003" interference is appropriate. Kind of depends on the size of the stem and the material from the stem.

Another solution that will be permanent is to build a weld on the stem and then turn it to the correct diameter. I've done the weld and turn fix and it is usually a pretty easy operation. I've never done the dimples on the stem but have used it to tighten the fit for a bearing race in an aluminum wheel hub on a BMW with sidecar. Got word from the owners when they returned home it was still tight over 2,500 miles later.

Best,

Jeff
Jeff Saline
2010 Gear Up
-Good, Fast, Cheap. Pick Two
-Just because something isn't true, no reason you can't believe it. Hub McCann Second Hand Lions
-Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

User avatar
Claus
Hero of the Soviet Union - 2019
Hero of the Soviet Union - 2019
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2015 1:19 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: MT-9 Headstock steering bearings question

Post by Claus » Sun Jul 14, 2019 12:49 pm

I would say it should be between a slip fit and a press fit. I do not know the English word for it, in German it's called Übergangspassung.(transition fit?)
If you don't have a triple tree to swap, Jeff's idea to weld on and turn to fit would be ok. Or to turn the stem thinner and shrink a bushing onto it that makes it fit.
Both above mentioned taper bearing sets should fit perfect (should be for BMW pre 1969)
owned bikes: 93 Ural rig domestic model, 01 Ural 750 rig, 92 BMW R100GS, 92 Suzuki GSX1100G rig, 95 BMW R100R rig with Ural sidecar, 98 Ural rig with BMW drivetrain under construction

User avatar
Korto
Comrade
Comrade
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 7:31 am

Re: MT-9 Headstock steering bearings question

Post by Korto » Mon Jul 15, 2019 3:16 am

<...grumble...>
Yeah, you're right. Aluminium's soft. It wouldn't last long, and then I'd have to pull the whole damn thing apart again.
I'll take it around the welder's tomorrow, tell him I'm looking for a fit that needs to be tapped on with a hammer.
I'll also get him to do the same with that bearing nut, too, unless someone's got a good reason why that would be a bad idea. I prefer the thought of the steering rod being held firmly top and bottom.
1972 Dnepr MT-9... mostly... I think...

Post Reply